Not having to outsource presentation to another program, being able to bring clients in and provide them with an interactive design review using the Archicad model, “they leave the office with expectations met,” according to Jerrod.Īnd clients who’ve had the full 3D design experience feel justified in their choice to engage an architect, and to pay a higher level of fees for a deeper level of service.ArchiCAD 2.0 released in 1986 – image is retrieved from Īround the early 2000s, ArchiCAD gained a considerable amount of users especially around Europe and Asia. The ability to do sun studies through the seasons has been a value add for clients. After two hours using Twinmotion, which has a direct link to Archicad, he felt comfortable.
#Archicad vs revit how to#
Jerrod recalled spending a whole day in Lumion before feeling like he was just starting to learn how to use the software.
#Archicad vs revit software#
No more exporting to PhotoShop or other software for rendering touch up. The firm has consolidated its multiple seats of AutoCAD, Revit, 3dsMax and Lumion into Archicad licenses. Every small firm can relate to that struggle.īut there have also been opportunities for software simplification. “Trying to implement office standards while at the same time working has been a challenge,” said Jerrod. The original graphic standards were solidly grounded in AutoCAD, refreshed with a layer of Revit, now with an Archicad overlay of more options. Office standards were a typical patchwork. “It includes simple things like where to find different commands and how to personalize the interface,” said Jerrod. Tom Simmons, Business Director at ARCHVISTA, provided documentation “cheat sheets” for people with a Revit background to help make the switch to Archicad smoother. Today everyone in the office has at least one project underway in Archicad, while projects started in Revit will continue through completion. “There’s a level of design very evident in the work that we do.” Archicad was a perfect fit for their portfolio.Īnd with integrated construction services, Archicad provides a software platform from concept through completion for design-build. “Design is the motto of our firm, you can look around the Santa Cruz area and tell which projects are Fuse projects,” said Jerrod. Initial hand sketching is still a critical tool but design moves into the computer sooner with Archicad.įluid capabilities to explore design through massing iterations and studies supports the firm’s design focus. “You really have to sketch out a lot of ideas and need a better understanding of the design before you bring it into Revit,” said Jerrod. Engineering coordination is not a major factor in these projects. Two key factors in their final decision were their project types and the firm’s design focus.ĩ0% of projects designed and built by Fuse Architecture are high-end custom residential. It was clearly silly to have both systems in an office of ten users. The partners at Fuse saw that too, and so began a six month debate over whether to fully switch to Archicad. “Very early on using Archicad, I recognized it had SketchUp qualities,” said Jerrod. It became clear to everyone that Archicad was a more powerful design tool than Revit. Jerrod’s colleagues had questions as they watched him work. While a leap beyond computer aided drafting (CAD) programs, Revit’s history as an engineering tool meant it was more focused on documentation than design.
What everyone knows about Revit is BIM, parametrically coordinated information drawn in 2D to create a 3D model. Instead, Jerrod’s dilemma became a side by side comparison between Archicad and Revit at this small architect-led design-build firm in Santa Cruz, California. “Rather than refresh my memory on Revit I’d last used 8 years before in school, I used Archicad and committed to taking Revit classes on-line to catch up,” said Jerrod. He’d been working in Archicad and there was no time to re-learn Revit on the job. When Jerrod Nicholls joined Fuse Architecture, he immediately jumped in as PM on three different projects.
0 kommentar(er)
